CIAO features users liked best
Back to the Survey
5 - All of them!
9 - saving parameters; scripting capabilities
12 - The DM tools philosophy, prism, *_process_events
13 - scripts to do common tasks (e.g. exposure correct and combine
multiple chips/observations)
14 - Threads
15 - command line, verbosity parameters, on the most part excellent ahelp
19 - The datamodel is brilliant. I cannot function without it. Also,
the parameter interface is good, as it allows easy scriptability of
tools.
21 - dm filename/filtering syntax; ease of scripting the various tools.
23 - Acis_process_events allows a lot of user control. The documentation
for CIAO tasks is extremely good. Dmcopy and dmlist I am likely to
use several times per day.
24 - i like being able to apply filters on the fly, e.g.,
dmcopy "evt2.fits[energy=500:1500]" evt2_lo.fits
25 - 1) command line oriented - allows real power use when scripted.
2) moderately powerful, if occasionally buggy, support for regions in many formats.
28 - tools are generally fairly flexible if one knows enough
30 - the dm syntax, and object oriented nature of sherpa
32 - Online threads, programs which apply many often-repeated tasks (i.e. acisspec, psextract)
38 - Extraction tools, processing....
39 - ahelp
40 - sherpa
43 - event processing and filtering
response tools
47 - The history info recorded in the file headers is very useful although difficult
to read due to formatting.
51 - dmcopy
sherpa
tg_reprocess.new
54 - Unix prompt input tools that do things well that are too complex to
re-invent like: dmimg2jpg; csmooth (haven't used it but looks good).
Also from unix prompt routines which acess CALDB data like: mkgarf; mkgrmf.
58 - command line capabilities and scriptibility;
I intend to move over to sherpa, but am "fine where I am".
60 - Everyone could study how to use CIAO by reading the thread by
himself/herself.
62 - sherpa
63 - I like the dm tools, especially dmcopy, dmlist, dmextract... all
the basics are there, and it's easy to look at and manipulate fits
files. I also like that CIAO interface a lot (command-line, that is),
since it's clean, pretty easy to script, and generally
well-documented.
64 - I like the no-nonsense dmlist commands.
69 - sherpa - I really like this, especially with the slang language embedded in it.
70 - dmcopy is very powerful.
psextract script is very convenient.
72 - coherent syntax
extensive documentation
75 - data model filtering
80 - I haven't used anything that's very unique, but the standard plotting things are nice...
81 - the helpdesk is outstanding - always a quick response
it is well designed and reliable
82 - Threads, Helpdesk
89 - ds9
90 - I like very much that you are still running in your native shell.
The uniformity of the interface makes the learning curve much less steep.
99 - threads and ahelp
103 - sherpa is a good extension of xspec
105 - The presence of on-line detailed threads for all needs.
106 - The virtual filename syntax, the physical coord system, sherpa
107 - excellent documentation
writing commands from unix prompt
108 - general reliability; sherpa; analysis threads
111 - * nice data model
* sherpa is great
121 - XSPEC
124 - Sherpa scriptability is a win, especially being able to set up and
refer to model components by name.
Embedded scripting languages are good, so slang looks very
intriguing. However, until there's better documentation on the
interfaces between slang and ciao, it doesn't do me a lot of good.
I do a lot of batch mode analysis, and sherpa seems to support that
reasonably well. (Features of xspec that drive me mad are the
problems running it in batch mode, and the problems in scripting
it. xspec has many operations requiring user feedback in the form
of 'yes' or 'no', and it is very difficult to set it up so that
the appropriate responses can be fed to it.)
125 - CHIPS, Sherpa for HETG spectroscopy
Back to the Survey
